The King’s Resume Examined Before His Coronation
Based on His Mother’s, the Now Deceased Queen
2023 is the Year the Royal Monarch of Britain, and all the subjects in the 40 some-odd countries will be Coronated, officially becoming The King of Britain and the Commonwealth. So, it is fitting we take a brief look at his resume that prepared him and landed the job. His taxpayer salary is one hundred million pounds per year plus benefits. (Princeling Sons Harry and William get about $10 million.)
Those benefits include things like the Coronation, which will cost the taxpayer in the millions — he doesn’t have to fundraise from foreigners like Trump did, because ‘mere figureheads’ or “symbols” of power like the King are like statues, so the taxpayer has to fork over the millions — which they are happy to do, just like they appear to pay for the upkeep of all his castles, staff, air transport to the Commonwealth countries to be greet by the living statue of symbolic power.
Really, people were shocked — shocked I tell you — that the Lady Susan Hussey grilled a naturally born British black woman who founded a charity at a charity event over her, you guessed it, blackness.
What did you expect from the most supreme supremacist family in the world?
Lady Hussey was a close “confidant” to the Queen. That means Hussey is a bigot. Ms. Ngozi Fulani, Sistah Space charity founder said, “she did not want to see Lady Hussey “vilified”.” Well, I do. Hussey’s confidence the Queen has a resume that stretches back extremely far. So, it’s fitting we are examining the royal resume to see if there is any racism in it, or if Hussey’s comment just popped into her head suddenly, at age 83, out of nowhere.
Indeed, that resume strong suggests the Queen’s and now King Charles’ family is the single biggest mostest racist family on the Earth. Ever. If you count by money, and slave trading, which they did under the monarch’s corporations he gave certificate of founding to. Over 3 million blacks served — in chains from Africa to the New World.
Diving into the details, those British corporations owned all the ships that brought the slaves from Africa to America, even the ones built in the colonies financed by the Crown, and when the individual states/American colonies started banning slave importation to their shores, like Delaware did in 1776 and Virginia did in 1778. It totally makes sense, since the British were landing ships in the America during a war, and the UK had the biggest navy. The British also made a lot of money off the slave trade so it would mean they would be financially weakened, and unable to also pick up their tobacco and other raw materials on those slave ships when heading back to the UK. So, Delaware and Virginia were being military strategic, seeming to weaponize the morality debate surrounding the slave trade.
The King’s family perfected and controlled slave trading to the United States and Caribbean from 1620–1807. My god the profits her family made from selling black people! Oh, the corporate profits from the slaves and the tobacco they farmed. The aristocrats and royal shareholders divvied up those profits on a quarterly basis.
Because there were no “American” corporations until 1776, because there was no America. The British corporations owned them and the ships, capital investments, with stock and certificates of incorporation, even in the colonies, coming solely and expressly from the Monarchs. They were the capitalists in charge until 1807. Check the records. They “owned” the South in spirit through land grants and land titles of colonist governors acting under the King until the end of the Revolutionary War.
The Monarch’s corporations controlled the cotton and tobacco farms and trade in part by loading the empty slave ships, raking in big cash back home where tobacco brought more money in than silver per pound. There was no “American South,” there was only the British Southern Colonies until the American Revolution. Controlling them and the trade meant running the operation through the Monarch’s legally appointed governing aristocrats, putting profits in the banks and estates back in jolly old England where it accrued fat interest.
Then, when they abolished slave trading in 1833, they collected reparations from the black slaves they freed, not paid to the slaves. The aristocratic shareholders and the Royals — the Kings and Queens — collected Reparations for freeing blacks from slavery for 150 years. The taxpayers finished paying back the Royals and their aristocratic shareholders until 2015 for the loss of the royally owned slaves. Like I said: Top racist family ever!
They have been maintaining their white blood line for 1200 years, not letting a single drop of black blood in. Then it happened! It infuriated the Queen. If she didn’t have a “stiff upper lip”, she would have said a few choice words (probably some N-bombs, probably at Megan) about that “Megan” person who contaminated her family’s perfect winning streak.
Yet now they are trying to gaslight us into thinking Queen mum was a Feminist. How is it feminist to be named head of the most powerful family in the country just because she was born? That’s her only job skill listed on her resume when applying for the position of Queen. Resume says:
“I was born and deserve to be Queen. My plans are to handle a multi-billion-dollar fortune, become the richest woman in the world, give permission for parliament to meet through the presence of my Mace, and grant permission to Prime Ministers to resign their position or to take their post based solely on MY permission. No piece of legislation can become law without MY permission, given directly through me or my representative in Parliament. I will carry out these duties due to my sole qualification of being born. Additionally, based on this critical birth skill, I will collect taxes for the people to use so I travel to impose myself as Monarch over all Commonwealth countries, appear on their 33 different currencies (or 35, who can keep count) as necessary, to maintain all my properties, and to spend on celebrations of myself so they can celebrate my birth that granted me rights. My asking salary per year from the taxpayer is 100 Million Pounds.” (No, really, that’s her yearly taxpayer salary, about $120 Million.)
Wow, what a jammed packed resume full of feminist credentials. Imagine promoting your feminist credibility of “being a mother,” who has tons of nannies and chefs behind the scenes doing the real work of motherhood. Paid for by the British taxpayers to run the estates and upkeep them — so tourists can look at them.
I shouldn’t mock it: Motherhood is important for being a Queen, it says “I’m a womb!” Very important qualification for declaring herself to be a feminist. And collecting $120 million a year in salary from the British, plus millions to upkeep the estates and staff, plus millions for the Jubilee celebrations.
Whatever the Monarchs tell you, you believe without thought or question. Since you can’t question their authority, even by holding up a carboard sign that says “Not my Queen” [now King], why shouldn’t she say the opposite: “I’m not a racist, I’m a feminist.” Half of our country at least hated the guts of our would-be monarch, Trump. Four years was long enough. But for 1200 years the British have no choice (excluding when that time in 1649 they chopped the head of King off for Treason –you are so lucky Trump if you face arrest for the Insurrection, you wouldn’t face that).
Deference is the worst poison.
That British poison prohibits the Monarchy’s subjects to calling a spade a spade — or a whitey cracker a whitey cracker. And yet, yet, many still worship that throne, the Crown.
Oh, the royal intrigue! The daily handwaving. The handwringing over Charles the New King, whose resume says “Son of Queen” scribbled on top of the Queen’s resume (see above). On the bottom he scrawled, “I came out of that feminist womb. I, too, was born. So please include all the “estate” money, the two estates that pay out over fifty million pounds a year to the rest of the money Mummy Queen made. I will now be head of the $88 billion dollar fortune. And I’m a feminist and anti-racist.” (No, really, that’s how much one estimate is of the Royal Net Worth, $88 Billion, though they hide all their books, so it’s most certainly on the low end.)
When — no, seriously — when are people going to stop worshipping the Royal Supremacists who have collected taxpayer money for slaves they lost or “freed”? Now we know why Lady Hussey, the Queen’s consort, can’t stand the presence of Ms. Fulani of British Sistah Space charity, and why I at least want to see Sistah Hussey vilified even if Ms. Fulani doesn’t. Why can’t the Monarchy and many British stand a drop of black blood, yet whose PR person declared the usual anti-factual truth in a written statement, “The royal family unequivocally condemns racism.”
It’s too bad they unequivocally practiced it. And stuffed their bank accounts from it, still living off the interest.
