The British monarchy did start the slave trade through certificates of incorporation from the King, which allowed for aristocratic shareholders to invest in the ships, all of which they owned, that then brought slaves from Africa to Virgina to plant and harvest tobacco. When the American colonist starting ending their slave trade in the 1770 and 80s on a state by state basis, and then altogether in 1807, the British later responded not by giving up their colonist empire instinct, but by buying Gatlin guns from America in 1869, hauling them too Africa and slaughtering black Africans when invading their countries, killing a thousand or two with machine guns in a single encounter during their invasion with a single Machine gun manned by four British invaders, then enslaving the "locals" under the pretext of Colonialization to steal their natural resources, which they no longer got for free from America: coal, chocolate, minerals, other agricultural crops, gold. They masterfully covered it all up with elegance and fine manners, but in reality their pattern of invade, slaughter, enslave, steal resources was very well established and went on until the end of world war II. The whole time the monarchs and royals collected their proifts through shares in the corporations they started through certificates of incorporation, while also getting paid for the slaves that were lost from having freed their direct slaves in America and from the slave trade. They made the British taxpayer pay them for the loss of their enslaved property. They also slaughtered Africans, SYrians and others in the Middle East, subcontinent Indians, Chinese, and looted their cultural art and artifacts, hauled it back to Britain to put in the British Royal Museum and won't give it back.

So you're assuming that this five-hundred-year-old habit and pattern of plundering, looting, resource stealing by cheap enslaved labor, diminishing the humanity of the "locals" with different skin color in those places mentioned, and overing it all up with high teea, fine etiquette and the impenetrable attitude of "You can't say That about the Queen" (or King) will hide their immoral superiority complex of supremacy? Well, you're right, it does work with most people. But for me, Prince Andrew is just doing what his family always had and gotten away with.