Porn Star Throws Her Lawyer in Jail

Bren Kelly
6 min readJun 17, 2022

--

Real “Lesser Black Woman” Power on Display

If you had to guess: Do they look like they are fighting for or against democracy?
If you had to guess: Do they look like they are fighting for or against democracy?

Such a beautiful outcome. First, she describes spanking the president before his bland sexual performance in bed, and then she sends her lawyer to jail. It’s a very inspirational story for women everywhere. Let me mansplain why.

Headline:

Avenatti Gets 4 Years for Defrauding Stormy Daniels

First of all, as a man, I can tell you they — rich powerful white men in particular, but, go ahead, throw in all men — look down on female pornography performers. Dare we say ‘actors.’ While performance is an art form of fantasy creation, female performance creates fantasies to serve gratification designed mostly for male viewing.

Sure, lesbians I guess can watch the same lesbian porno-displays — I have no idea though as I’m not one. And women can use pornography as well. But I highly suspect, not even doing a Google search for numbers or percent or users, that men comprise 92% or more of porn “usage.” That includes gay men, as, having one brother who is gay, I’m guessing they have a higher rate of usage then straight men.

Take this other headline on a type of white men of power who constantly “get away with it”:

Georgetown Won’t Punish Professor For “Lesser Black Woman” Post

Yes, the new head of the Center for the Constitution thinks women and black Americans are “Lesser”. He was what lawyers called “exited.” The Center told him to jump off the cliff before they pushed him. He was of course referring to Supreme Court Justice Brown. Sure, he’ll worm his way out this by explaining he was speaking specifically about “this” black American woman, and not all women or black Americans. But we don’t believe him do we when he speaks up from the pit he landed into, Fox news?

OK, I’ll speak for myself and whitesplain this as well: He is a racist misogynist pig whose “slip” of the tongue reveals he has no interest in the constitution and has absolutely no ability to truly understand what inalienable right are. That they are foundational and apply to ALL humans and citizens.

And no, I don’t want you other whites protesting, and here some “Originalist” garbage.

And I don’t want to tolerate the comment either that “well, the founders didn’t “mean” blacks or women.” I frankly don’t want to hear this gross exaggeration and rerun that is a pure excuse to brainwash me. That is not what it says. It says nothing about inalienable rights being restricted to any one because of anything. And it can’t. Because then they would not be inalienable rights.

A few “founding humans” (they’re not my fathers, spiritual or otherwise, they never said they were; it was fabricated a condescending brainwashed demeaning term to gentrify these white slaveholders) were themselves bamboozled by a very few northern liberalist philosophers from Europe who devised this term to construct a political ideology to directly oppose all dictators in Europe (kings, queens). Europe was a hot mess of mass repression by despots in fancy dresses and had never been anything else.

You all have to STOP giving homage to these dictators and watching those dramas of tyrants who oppressed all the whites in Europe and brutally treated everyone like disposable trash. Like 95 percent of “Europeans” were repressed farmers. These stupid dandies dressed French and English “Your Lord” and “Your Excellency” garbage has one hundred percent gaslight your worldview into believing there is something dignified about watching aspiring nobility be racist repressors.

That Bridgerton garbage on Netflix is even worse muddlecrap. It takes a diverse cast — blacks, Muslims, Hindus, and whatever — and puts them in the roles of landowners who drove the whip of human ownership — serfs, indentured servants, slaves. How is that not brainfogging people — especially women, especially black American women — into dreaming of swooning with nobility. This is a cast of duchess and dukes who jostling for position of wealth granted and controlled by the King, a dictatorial fascist whose only qualification for complete control over others and taxing the poor is being born with magical blood. Being born- what? That is not a job skill. You can’t apply to lead a company, let alone a people, based on the sole bullet point on your resume that reads: I was born first male in my family. Huh? That is the system you are idealizing by watching this racist crap? That’s not much of a resume.

And that is the exact opposite of the secular equality recognized in each person. Natural Rights, inalienable rights: that is the anti-monarch ideal rebellious philosophers concocted that got many banished for proposing a system to destroy the very foundation of Europe. These were the ones kicked out, hating the king and all he stood for.

This very basic and radical philosophy of inalienable rights was defiantly insubordinate and thus still threatens the powerful right wingers and others in power. To those few who understood it fully it, like Thomas Paine who carried it on ship, like John Adams and son and a precious few others, we owe some respect.

To the rest of those men, or “fathers,” in the picture of the signing of these documents, they had but an inkling of the meaning, no true concept except “equality.” They were still dressed in fluffy wigs representing repressive aristocracy of the Eurotrash dictators. Only Franklin seemed ready to grasp it, dressed in plain clothes, fraternizing with abolitionist Quakers.

Look, I’m white. But that repressive systemic directly implied by a crown is repulsive to me as an American.

That type of European ancestry part so admired by white supremacists is anathema to the profound radical ideal of inalienable rights.

When lawyers like this guy are chosen to head of the Constitution Center let slip the idea of a “Lesser Black Woman” post, they should be openly fired, “exited.” The very foundation for firing this white male is to say, Ooops, we didn’t know he didn’t understand the basis of the constitution. Not fired just because his twitter “slip” show he is racist and misogynist — though those are excellent reasons. But because someone who deeply understands the ideal our country is based on would never, ever say this in any circumstances.

A constitutional lawyer who can’t fathom this foundational ideal is not qualified for this highly symbolic job. He simply does not comprehend the absolute reversal of the world’s political order the birth of this ideal of inherent rights represents. It is when fully understood one can grasp the basis for democracy, not just ours but any democracy. Ours just happened to be the first based on this ideal.

But when deeply understood, it is the basis for diversity, genderless equality. It sees the very foundational sameness of use all. The ideal destroys European kingship, Russian Czarism, Arabian Sheikh-hood, Chinese Emperors. Its destructive capacity killed any racial identity.

But seeing it, taking it fully to heart is tough. And this lazy white male professor does not get it. It is something that can’t let slip the autocratic phrase that came out of his pen and onto his internet post. He shows the same clinging to the practices of power repression that all practiced at our nation’s founding, clinging to the easy desire to rule using the tools of difference and inherent belief that superiority is implied by wealth. He needed to be fired openly, joyously. The Center made a big mistake in letting him keep his job and totally discredited itself by letting him stay even for day.

And that is why I’m glad to see Stormy Daniels put her pig lawyer in jail. The perceived “lowest” woman, the pornstar, said no way, buddy that’s my cash. You’re stealing from this call girl. I’m calling you out. I’m a powerful director who uses sex for money, not for submission. You underestimated me and I’m angry. And I’m showing it proudly. And her abusive lawyer was fired, jailed!, for not respecting her inalienable rights. For underestimating her. Appoint one of the other two black women judges to head the constitutional law center. Even the second or third “runner up” I trust to do a better job.

Now if we can just get all the rest of the repressed who suffering from injustices to also rise and get their day in court. Maybe they will then get their due — like getting reparations, the money they were defrauded out of.

--

--

Bren Kelly
Bren Kelly

Written by Bren Kelly

Engaged in Inequalities, dismantling Western Consciousness, confronting American narratives, seeking inherent injustices to address.

Responses (5)